patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

District 63 Plans to Meet Illinois Education Reform Requirements

Two laws will affect teacher evaluations, tenure, dismissals

 

East Maine Elementary District 63 is moving forward with its plans to meet the requirements of two state laws that combine to require an overhaul of how teachers are evaluated, how they can achieve tenure and how they are let go when there are layoffs.

Superintendent Scott Clay reported on the reform efforts at the Dec. 7 school board meeting at Apollo School in Des Plaines. He said that one of the laws requires all Illinois school districts to use student growth as one component of teacher and principal evaluations.

That law was passed as part of a push for the state to apply for federal Race to the Top education funding. While Illinois did not end up receiving Race to the Top funding from the department of education, the law stands, he said.

So now school districts must figure out what measures to use to determine student growth, and how to incorporate that into teacher evaluations, Clay said.

Earlier: District 63 Proud of English Language Learners’ Progress

The district does catch a break because it is in the last group of Illinois school districts who must use student growth to evaluate teachers, starting in 2016. The state is starting with the lowest-performing districts, which have to comply with that part of the law first, so there will be plenty of data before District 63 has to put its program into place.

“We won’t be making many decisions about that until we get some feedback from around the state,” Clay said.

Principals, on the other hand, must be evaluated with student growth data starting next year, Clay said. “A lot of us think that’s totally backwards,” he said, “to start with the principals and then go to the teachers.”

Also next year the district must put each teacher into one of four categories when he or she is evaluated: excellent, proficient, needs improvement or unsatisfactory. This year, District 63 is using three categories for evaluations: excellent, satisfactory and unsatisfactory.

Once the four categories are in place, they will be used to put teachers into four groups when it comes to deciding who gets laid off first. The first group are teachers who have not yet been evaluated. They can be let go at the will of the district. The second includes teachers who have received a rating of unsatisfactory or needs improvement in the last two years; the third includes teachers who have been deemed proficient and the fourth includes teachers who have been deemed excellent for the previous two years, or for two of the previous three years, Clay said.

Under the new rules, teachers who have more seniority but lower ratings would be laid off before teachers who have higher ratings and less seniority.

District 63 includes Apollo School and Stevenson School in Des Plaines; Gemini Junior High, Mark Twain School and Nelson School in Niles; Melzer School in Morton Grove; and Washington School in Glenview.

Want more news? Like your local Patch on Facebook.

Related Topics: East Maine Elementary District 63, Education Reform, and Teacher Evaluations
What do you think of Illinois education reform? Tell us in the comments.

Clark Kent

5:24 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

PATCH reports: "'Principals, on the other hand, must be evaluated with student growth data starting next year,' Clay said. 'A lot of us think that’s totally backwards,” he said, “to start with the principals and then go to the teachers.'" HORRORS! HOLD "ADMINISTRATOR" RESPONSIBLE???? What nerve! (Reality check- if the students are learning because the teachers aren't teaching, then the "administrators" aren't administering.)

I would NEVER accuse Mr. Clay of being a crybaby...No! Not me! Never! But it is odd that he takes home such a salary based on his effectiveness in the district (I presume) based upon...er...what?. Such effectiveness requires that he is and stays on top of instruction (by the teachers) and efforts by the students themselves (and their parents). Suddenly...mirabile dictu...WATCH THE TEACHERS! It's as if nothing happens except by them, though not necesssarily because of them. The Board evaluates the "administrators" on rubrics which belie what every other employee does. In some circles, it might be called a con-game. "Pay me a big salary and I'll produce," saith them "but don't hold me to the same standards. I'm special...I am a highly educated "administrator" and I know more than you and they do."
http://www.familytaxpayers.org/salary.php

In private industry, the "administrator" excuses would be put in the circular file and the author sent a pink slip. In education, they get salary increases!

Reply

Leave a comment