In an effort to curb the state's budget woes without bailing on current Illinois public sector pension obligations, a press release announced Illinois lawmakers Elaine Nekritz (D-Northbrook) and Daniel Biss (D-Evanston) introduced House Bill 6258 in Springfield today.
"The pension debate has featured too much finger-pointing and progress has been disappointingly slow," Biss said in the release. "This bill contains ideas drawn from business, labor, and civic groups as well as our colleagues in the General Assembly. We believe that it is a roadmap for solving this problem in January..."
Changes to the state's public employee pension policy, as proposed by the bill inlclude:
- Allowing cost-of-living pension increases only for the first $25,000 of an employee’s pension.
- Increasing employees’ retirement age up to five years, depending on current age.
- Increasing employees’ pension contributions.
- Placing new hires in a cash balance plan that combines the best features of defined contribution (or 401(k)) plans and defined benefit plans.
- Further limiting legislators’ pension increases.
- Gradually shifting teacher pension costs from the state to the school districts that determine salaries.
“Daniel and I understand this is a difficult issue for all of us, and we do not approach it lightly,” Nekritz said in the release. “We have supported other reform legislation and would definitely consider other good ideas moving forward."
Nekritz is chairwoman of the House Personnel and Pensions Committee and a key pension negotiator.
According to the press release, both legislators are calling for Springfield lawmakers to pass the bill before the current legislative term ends on Jan. 9.
I say that before anyone else is asked to put another dime into this system, that all State employees' pensions get rolled back to where they would be if the salary spiking fraud hadn't occurred. We also need to end the practice of salary spiking altogether to prevent more fraud in the future. This would show that the State employees are willing to deal honestly with the people who are being forced to pay for their retirement. If they are not willing to accept this, then I say dump all the pension assets on the unions and let them sort it out among themselves.
The same should be true for teachers. Didn't the unions back Nekritz & Biss? Why are they not pro worker now?
They keep complaining they don't get Social Security benefits. Fine... let's move them over to our wonderful plan. If it's good enough for the rest of us, it should be good enough for State employees. There's a whole bunch of perfectly fair good ideas out there that can get this problem fixed without destroying your property values.