.

Women's Progressive Group Puts Dold 'On Notice'

Emily’s List threatens to target freshman congressman in 2012 campaign.

Politics may have played as big a role as policy when Emily’s List placed  on its "On Notice List" last week. 

Emily’s List, a group dedicated to electing Democratic women to office, has named Dold among nine Republicans who it considers vulnerable to a female challenger and may allocate resources to defeat the congressman in 2012. The organization claims Dold's record is consistently “anti-woman” since joining Congress in January. 

“The budget that Rep. Dold voted for included just about every anti-woman measure under the sun,” said Jess McIntosh, spokeswoman for the Washington-based group. “It would eliminate the family planning services women rely on to keep themselves and their families healthy.” 

McIntosh's claim stems in part from what the group see's as Dold's desire to join with other House members to defund Planned Parenthood during the debate over two weeks ago. 

However, the family planning group sees the Illinois congressman from Kenilworth as a supporter rather than an adversary. 

“They [Emily’s List] don’t tell us what to do,” said Pam Sutherland, vice president of public policy at Planned Parenthood. “[Dold] actually spoke on the floor of the House in support of family planning and women’s health.” 

Dold was one of seven Republicans who voted in favor of Planned Parenthood and the only one who spoke in its defense, according to Sutherland.

When the final legislation was negotiated between President Barack Obama, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH),

Downplaying Emily’s List 

Dold dismissed his inclusion on Emily’s List as a political move that disregards his voting record in favor of the group's agenda to replace him with a Democrat. 

“Some groups are more interested in politics than policy,” Dold said. “I voted twice to keep funding for Planned Parenthood to provide preventive health care services, such as cancer screenings, well-woman exams, HIV testing and birth control.

"I have been, and will continue to be, an advocate for women’s healthcare in Congress,” he added. 

Former state (R-Glenview) also dismissed the Emily’s List criticism as politics. Dold defeated Coulson and others in the February 2010 primary to earn his party’s nomination in the House race, which he won with 51 percent of the vote in November. 

“This is what I would expect [from Emily’s List]. We know what they care about,” Coulson said. “People in the 10th District always review the facts and look at the record as much as any congressional district we may have [in this country].” 

McIntosh thinks the House's Republican majority is using fiscal restraint as an excuse to hurt women. 

“Dold and his Republican allies ran on job creation," McIntosh said. "But once in office, they pulled a bait-and-switch to focus on a radical agenda that takes away women’s rights and opportunities.

"We started this campaign to remind folks about the bait-and-switch in the GOP agenda and to suggest that might spell trouble for Republicans in 2012," she explained.

Job creation remains a priority 

For his part, Dold says he has not veered from the need . 

"My top priority has always been job creation,” he said. “I recently set up a 10th District jobs task force and have been traveling the district speaking with the unemployed, small businesses, financial institutions and educators to develop a plan to get our local economy back on track.” 

Some have not only doubted Dold’s support of women’s issues, but also whether he is a good fit for the 10th Congressional District. (D-Highland Park) questions his stated support for a women’s right to have an abortion. 

“[Dold] has dodged the issue," May said. "This district needs a leader on choice. Let it be known this is a very important issue in this district, and we need a representative with a strong record.”

Another Democrat who thinks Dold’s philosophy may put obstacles in his path to re-election is President Priscilla Sperling of Glencoe. She sees Dold’s reluctance to let the Bush-era tax cuts expire as a problem. 

“I expect when we see decisions like this [the Bush-era tax cuts], he will prove more conservative than the district,” Sperling said. “This will not be a plus for him.” 

(D-Deerfield) takes an even harsher view. She is critical of many of Dold’s votes with the Republican majority.

“He doesn’t represent me,” Feldman said. “He goes along with the Republicans and the Tea Party people.” 

Rene Thaler of Northbrook worked in the administration of former Gov. Jim Edgar, who was in office from 1991-99. Thaler, a Republican who is a former Democrat, cites Dold’s support of women’s issues and other policies as reasons he is a good fit the area. 

“Bob Dold is phenomenal on women’s issues," Thaler said. "His support of Israel and sound fiscal policies leave no doubt in my mind he is right for this district. He not only supports a women’s right to choose, but funding for breast cancer screenings and other issues of health for women."

Like Coulson, Thaler discounts Emily’s List’s attack on Dold’s record regarding women's issues. “They’ll go after anyone where there is a swing district," she said. 

Congressional votes create hard choices 

When asked about cutting funding from Planned Parenthood, Dold defended his decision, arguing that it was done to avoid a government shutdown.

“We have to take a look at what the bill will do,” Dold said. “We did not want to shut down the government. We voted to keep defense spending through Sept. 30. We cut spending $36.5 billion this [fiscal] year.” 

May understands the conundrum Dold faces when legislators must vote on a bill that has items they dislike. She has been there too.

“If it’s something very important you vote for it," May said. "In general, issues of women’s health and choice are very important."

Former Illinois Lt. Gov. Corinne Wood, a Republican from Lake Forest, dislikes the inclusion of any politically charged issues, such as Planned Parenthood, in emergency legislation to fund government operations through the end of the fiscal year. She would exclude them all. 

“They (Congress) should leave the hot button issues out,” said Wood, who served in the Illinois House of Representatives before becoming lieutenant governor. “The deficit is the biggest issue we face to get our country back on track. That’s too bad for us (the American people).” 

May, Coulson, Thaler, Feldman, Sperling and Dold all agree on one thing. They know the state is losing a seat in Congress due to redistricting based on U.S. Census data.

, the new boundaries are unknown. All districts will increase from their current size of about 650,000 people to nearly 710,000.

“I’d like to keep as much of the 10th District intact as possible,” Dold said. “This is a great district and the race will be competitive as it always has been.”

Dold is off to a fast start in a possible re-election campaign, even if the district’s boundaries are uncertain. He was one of the top GOP fundraisers among House freshmen, collecting about $311,000 for the quarter that ended March 31, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission.

alyce arends April 21, 2011 at 09:43 PM
Dold has an agenda: cut the UNNECESSARY SPENDING. it is time to quit partisan politics and think of what is going to save America. no time for stupidity... America is on the line
john corley April 21, 2011 at 10:56 PM
What happened to the label "Liberal"? Hubert Humphrey and Ted Kennedy wore it proudly. Then, it became a dirty word and professional politicos like the Washington-based Angie's List became "Progressives"! The only thing "progressive" about these people is their strong desire to progressively take more and more of other people's money away from them! A lot of people I know would support funding for Planned Parenthood if they didn't derive the lion's share of their revenues from abortions. There are plenty of reasonable, important, and justifiable areas for Planned Parenthood to promote. It's just that a lot of tax-payers think that abortion is inherently immoral and shouldn't be supported by taxpayer funding. In a 100 years, abortion will have been technologically made obsolete. Like slavery is viewed today, our descendants will look back on it as a barbaric and savage attack on the unprotected.
Rosemary Olson April 22, 2011 at 02:33 AM
TO say that Emily's List is "a group dedicated to electing Democratic women to office" is false and shoddy reporting. They are a "pro-abortion" group pure and simple. Basic reporting skills would reveal that they throw their money against pro-life Democrats as well as Republicans, male or female, all over the country.
Ren April 22, 2011 at 09:05 AM
Ms. Olson, go to http://emilyslist.org/ (the organization's own site) and read the first paragraph: "Welcome to EMILY's List, a community of progressive Americans dedicated to electing pro-choice Democratic women to every level of office. " It's very clear from his voting records and speeches on the floor that Mr. Dold has supported Planned Parenthood, often going against his fellow Republicans. By going after Dold, EMILY's List is making it very clear that this is not about abortion rights... otherwise Dold wouldn't be a target, instead he'd make their "favorable Republicans list" (it doesn't actually exist). No, this is about politics pure and simple. It's a Democrat organization using pro-choice as an excuse to vote in more democrats, even when the republican opponent supports the same rights. And to Mr. Corley, I assume you don't mind your taxes going up significantly to care for all the unwanted children that would have been aborted? Or are you okay with young children dieing on our streets due to starvation?
Naomi Chambers April 22, 2011 at 02:00 PM
Planned Parenthood is PRO-LIFE! Planned parenthood provides women's health services and counseling that promote life. By educating people about birth control, you prevent unwanted babies, thereby preserving life!
Phil Collins April 22, 2011 at 02:23 PM
I agree with John Corley. The defintion of "progressive" is determined by each person's defintion of "progress." I think that progress includes cutting tax rates, cutting government spending, and saving unborn babies from murder. Therefore, conservatives should call ourselves progressives.
Pete Koukos April 22, 2011 at 03:05 PM
Re: Emily's list - big deal! They have never supported anyone with a fiscal conservative bent.
David S. Janschutz April 22, 2011 at 03:41 PM
When is the progressive group,going to put Obama on NOTICE. Just one more attack,on the REPUBLICANS.Thay are a joke,just like OBAMA!!!!!!!!!
Sadira April 22, 2011 at 05:22 PM
Planned Parenthood spends only 3% for abortions out of 100% of their funding. Or to put it another way, 97% of Planned Parenthood's funding goes for screenings, other healthcare prevention and general health care.
Phil Collins April 22, 2011 at 05:29 PM
The 10th Amendment, of the U.S. Constitution, states that all powers that aren't reserved, for the federal government, in the Constitution, are reserved for the states. I read every word of the Constitution, and I didn't see the word "health" or "medical." Therefore, all federal laws that mention healthcare are unconstitutional and should be repealed.
Deadcatbounce April 22, 2011 at 09:38 PM
Sorry Sadira, you need to get your facts correct. Abortions make up 3% of its total services, not funding. Planned Parenthood’s chart shows that abortions made up 3 percent of its total services. Another way to measure the group’s abortion services, however, is to divide the total number of abortions by the number of clients. For example, Planned Parenthood said that it “provided nearly 11.4 million medical services for 3 million people” in 2009. Its 2011 fact sheet says it performed 332,278 abortion procedures in 2009. That would mean that roughly one out of every 10 clients received an abortion. First, we think many people would acknowledge a difference between providing an abortion and, say, handing out a pack of condoms or conducting a blood test. The former is a significant surgical procedure, whereas the latter are quick and inexpensive services. So Planned Parenthood’s use of "services" as its yardstick likely decreases abortion’s prominence compared to what other measurements would show. Using dollars spent or hours devoted to patient care would likely put abortion way above 3 percent in the calculations. Second, it’s worth noting that Planned Parenthood self-reported these numbers, although the group says each affiliate’s numbers are independently audited. (There is no single, national audit.) So we have no choice but to accept their accuracy more or less on faith.
S Macnamara April 23, 2011 at 02:10 AM
I find most of these comments totally ignorant of the point of the article which was to support Dold and his campaign.
Greenwood April 24, 2011 at 04:40 AM
The point I take away from the article and the comments is that Emily's List, "a group dedicated to electing Democratic women to office," operates on the intellectual level of junior high student council politics. I'll look to Emily's List when I vote for head cheerleader, not when I vote for a Congressional representative.
Ellen Lewis May 11, 2011 at 02:57 PM
Alyce: You are spot on here. When PP was specifically targeted to be defunded earlier this year, Dold voted against defunding. It was his position that he would not pick and choose budget-reduction targets. This is part of across the board spending cuts and he voted yes.
Ellen Lewis May 11, 2011 at 03:02 PM
Phil: Thanks for speaking plainly the truth of abortion. There is a rising tide of anti-abortion sentiment since Obama's election and think it might have something to do with people's willingness to speak plainly. We now know that it is not an alien clump of tissue, the lie that was perpetrated for many years, but rather an unborn baby.
Ellen Lewis May 11, 2011 at 03:06 PM
Naomi: If Planned Parenthood is pro-life, why have they never supported an anti-abortion candidate? You are playing a losing game of semantics here. Look to China and Japan and Europe to see the effects of "preserving life by preventing unwanted babies." Life must create more life, or countries and civilizations decline and die.
Ellen Lewis May 11, 2011 at 03:10 PM
Rosemary: Hurray! Thanks for telling it like it is.
Ellen Lewis May 11, 2011 at 03:18 PM
John: I'm giving society 25 years to come to grips with the savagery and injustice of abortion. Thanks God it is being done in a relatively peaceful way... change the hearts and the laws will follow. With the Civil War, we changed the law but it has taken a century to change a majority of hearts. And indeed they have been changed. While not an Obama supporter, hurray for the USA that we elected a black president. We are truly in a post-racial society. Now, if we could just get Obama to get on board the train of life... Deadcatbounce did a great job of crunching the real numbers! Thanks.
Deep Dish Pizza May 24, 2011 at 06:49 AM
@ Ellen - Dold and Judy Biggert made a big dog-n-pony show about the "planned parenthood amendment" and sent out a ton of press releases. What passes for reporters these days fell all over themselves copying and pasting what Dold had to say. And then Dold voted against Planned Parenthood anyway. And he voted to redefine rape. And he voted to force the IRS to audit women if they talk to their doctor about their lady parts. And he voted to strip businesses of their tax breaks if they had comprehensive insurance plans for employees. And he voted to kill off Medicare as we know it. How in the heck are any of these things "across the board spending cuts"? It's right-wing teabagger social engineering and Bob "I'm more conservative than I let on" Dold is just showing his true cruel conservative colors.
Deep Dish Pizza May 24, 2011 at 06:51 AM
Hey John - Why do conservatives support POST-BIRTH ABORTIONS in Iraq and elsewhere with tens of thousands of innocent unprotected women and children killed (errrr, I mean "collaterally damaged")???
Deep Dish Pizza May 24, 2011 at 06:56 AM
Same with all the driving and highway laws. This Internet thing too. You know what else isn't mentioned in the Constitution? Breathing air. But you know what IS in the Constitution? The Commerce Clause. Go read it. It kinda says "ALL COMMERCE". I'd say health insurance is commerce the same way sailors' insurance was back when Congress first put together a law declaring that sailors needed to buy insurance ... a few hundred years ago right after the Constitution was ratified. Clearly, since the act of breathing is not allowed since it's not mentioned in our Constitution, you've been holding your breath too long Phil. It's effecting your head. (One other thing not mentioned in the Constitution? Corporations. Companies. Business entities. Yet here we have a supposedly "conservative" and "strict constructionist" Supreme Court declaring that not only are Corporations real, live people but that they can also spend unlimited amounts of money buying off our elections. Brilliant!)
Phil Collins May 24, 2011 at 03:46 PM
Abortion violates the 5th Amendment. That amendment states that no one "be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law." Each abortion ends a baby's life. Therefore, each time a woman gets an abortion, that amendment is violated, unless the baby is convicted of a crime and sentenced to be executed.
Anne May 24, 2011 at 04:08 PM
Phil; per the Supreme Court, Abortion is legal, I am sure the court is smart enough to know if there was an amendment violation. All the small government conservatives seem to be taking great pains to make sure that they are involved in everyone else's life.....who is the socialist?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something