.

D63: It's Unfair To Say Good Schools Are 'Not Adequate'

Parents in D-63 recently received letters saying 5 of 7 schools are not making 'adequate yearly progress' under the NCLB law. But educators say the schools are performing well--it's the law that's flawed.

Five of the seven schools in East Maine Elementary District 63 did not make "adequate yearly progress" last year under the federal No Child Left Behind law.

In a Wednesday presentation, District 63 Superintendent Scott Clay and Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Charlene Cobb stressed that the district is nevertheless educating its students well.

Cobb and Clay described NCLB as a flawed law which never got the revamping that was intended, and indicated it's not useful as a way of measuring school performance.

Earlier:

“The biggest question I get is, is my child’s school failing? I would have to unequivocally say no, our schools are not failing,” Cobb told about 10 parents at the Sept. 5 school board meeting at Gemini Junior High, where the presentation by Cobb and Clay took place.

The questions and concerns came from parents who recently received letters from the district saying that their school had not made adequate yearly progress – in some cases, for the fourth year in a row – under the federal law.

Those letters are mandated by the law, but they don’t do a very good job of explaining what’s really going on.

What 'No Child Left Behind' Set Out To Do

The No Child Left Behind Law was passed in 2001 and required states to come up with assessments in reading and math that would be taken by all students, and with standards that students would have to meet on those assessments.

Results are reported not only for every school, but for subgroups of at least 45 students within schools, including racial and ethnic groups, students from low-income families, students with disabilities and students who are not proficient in English.

Each year, a certain percentage of students in each school – and the same percentage of students in each subgroup – must meet or exceed the state’s testing standards for the school to be considered to have made adequate yearly progress. The percentage of students that must meet the standards has ratcheted up over the years; under the schedule, 100 percent of students are supposed to meet state standards in 2014.

“I think when we get to 100 percent in 2014, no district will meet AYP,” Clay said.

This year, the bar was set at 85 percent. That means, for example, that in a school with a large population of students who are not yet proficient in English, 85 percent of them would have to meet state standards on a reading test  written in English, Cobb said.

88 percent of D-63 6th graders made AYP, but it didn't count

In District 63, for example, 88 percent of all sixth-graders met or exceeded standards last year. But the district did not make AYP in sixth grade because 83 percent of low-income students, 43 percent of special education students and 58 percent of students with limited proficiency in English met the standards.

Law gives an advantage to smaller districts and schools

The law makes it easier for smaller, more homogeneous schools to pass, because they often do not have 45 students in any particular subgroup. If there are fewer than 45 students in a subgroup, then their performance is not tracked under the law.

In District 63, only in Morton Grove and in Glenview made AYP last year.

Gemini parent Marianne Gudmundsson, who spoke earlier in the meeting about her son being in some classes with nearly 40 students at Gemini, pointed out that schools without enough disadvantaged kids to make up a subgroup do have an advantage, because teachers can focus their attention on a class that is moving more or less at the same pace.

Younger grades make AYP more than higher grades

As a rule, Clay said, more elementary schools make AYP than junior highs, and more junior highs than high schools, because they are smaller and draw from smaller neighborhoods and don’t have as many subgroups whose performance is tracked. This year, only nine of 1,325 high schools in Illinois made AYP, and six of them are selective enrollment schools in Chicago.

D-63 students rose from  82 to 96 percent in meeting standards

To demonstrate that the district is effective when it comes to educating students, Clay said that of the 216 students who were with the district from third grade until they graduated from eighth grade last spring, the percentage meeting state standards grew from 82 percent in third grade in 2006 – when schools had to show only 47.5 percent meeting state standards – to 96 percent when they graduated.

Why NCLB has become a flawed measuring system, they say

Part of the problem, Cobb said, is that when the law was passed in 2001, 11 years ago, it was supposed to be reauthorized in five years, and lawmakers could make changes. Many educators never expected the standard to get anywhere close to 100 percent.

But it never was reauthorized, and likely won’t be before 2014, Clay said.

Under the law, children in schools that have not met adequate yearly progress standards for at least two years are to be given the option of being bused to another school in the same district that does meet the standards. School districts must spend at least 5 percent of their Title I federal money to do so. But once there is no more funding available for busing, no more students can participate.

Last year, District 63 spent about $100,000 – about 15 percent of its Title I money – to bus 40 children. Because it has no more money available for busing, no new children will be able to participate, Cobb said.

In schools that have not made AYP for at least three years, low-income students who did not meet standards must be offered supplemental education services to be provided by an outside vendor at the district’s expense, Cobb said. The district is supposed to spend 5 percent of its Title I money on that as well.

Both Cobb and Clay said the No Child Left Behind Law did some good things, by increasing school accountability and forcing districts to pay attention to the performance of groups of students that are disadvantaged. But, Clay said, it’s not fair to label schools that are working as “failing.”

“It’s a very flawed law,” he said.


CK September 11, 2012 at 11:08 AM
Everything is alweys flawed but the people running things. There never flawed. Just give them more money and listen to their balooney. Dump tyhem and get new principles in the school and new boards.
kathlyn williams September 11, 2012 at 02:00 PM
LOL. Is this a joke? It is obvious we need to support our schools and teachers so that grammar in comments like the one above never have to happen to the children.
CK September 11, 2012 at 06:39 PM
Did you make fun of people like me with disabilities when you worked in Niles? Senior citizen worker? Good thing Im still young.
Mr Tibbs September 11, 2012 at 10:19 PM
I dont think Kathlyn was making fun of any disability as there is probably no way for her to know you have one since you didn't state that in your post. More likely, she is pointing out the irony of bad spelling and grammar in a post about the under performance in some of our schools based upon 'no child left behind' laws. I would similarly point that out. More so, i would point out flawed logic about 'dumping' our school board, particularly since they are elected officials and you get to 'dump' them every election cycle but instead they are the ones that have been selected by the populous.
CK September 15, 2012 at 12:39 AM
(To Michael Hugo- a note CK has asked me to pen so that it might be easier for you to read and presumably comprehend) Having fixed sturdy q-tips to prop up our eyelids, we read your previous posts. While you appear to be fixated on spelling and grammar we felt it imperative to remind you of your obvious inconsistencies. Among the Cardenas comments you, like your cohort Kathlyn Williams, fail to use capital letters for proper nouns...you know, like your names. Victor Hugo you're not, but you also use, as in the above post, small case "i" when it should be a capital letter in describing yourself (which you are fond of doing). Some of your sentences begin with small letters, and sometimes inside a sentence use a capital letter where one ought not be used. You have perhaps a spelling problem more heinous than CK since your "populous" in the above comment should be "populace." You incorrectly attempted to use the Greek prefix "pseudo-" when you used "anonomous psudonyms" when that correct form is "anonymous pseudonyms." In life we often use such prefixes as in the word "pseudo-intellectual," a term I am confident you have heard others use when in conversation with you. Your puerile attempt to correct what you fantasize as "flawed logic" is specious and egregious. The term is in American English and we would admonish you to occasionally use a dictionary when submitting posts.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »